• IP Copied!
    Click to Copy IP
    Loading...
  • Survival Judeconnors banned for "scamming"

    Status
    Not open for further replies.

    Artela

    Member
    Messages
    20
    Staff makes the decisions. There should be no prejudism. Staffs decisions are final.
    Additional, on the "Staff Decisions" thing.
    When staff give a ruling and then staff ban despite having ruled something was admissable... which of those decisions is "final"?
    In cases of doubt or of double-direction the benefit of dount shouold be given to the system user along with the corrected ruling _for future_ - otherwise it almost feels like entrapment.
     

    Lucas S.

    Well-Known Member
    Messages
    2,731
    Additional, on the "Staff Decisions" thing.
    When staff give a ruling and then staff ban despite having ruled something was admissable... which of those decisions is "final"?
    In cases of doubt or of double-direction the benefit of dount shouold be given to the system user along with the corrected ruling _for future_ - otherwise it almost feels like entrapment.
    Jude is an olderish player he hopefully would have read the rules once or twice. Ruinous is a newer member than Jude. Even though she may be Mod she may have only read the rules the same number as Jude. Either had the decision if they had read the rules. Ruinous just made a mistake.
     

    Artela

    Member
    Messages
    20
    Jude is an olderish player he hopefully would have read the rules once or twice. Ruinous is a newer member than Jude. Even though she may be Mod she may have only read the rules the same number as Jude. Either had the decision if they had read the rules. Ruinous just made a mistake.
    Sorry, but as youo were saying the staff decision is final.
    If the mod was too new to do the job... not the fault of the player
     

    majestuosoSlime

    Well-Known Member
    Messages
    77
    I agree with @MarshMelody, some of the rules need to be rewritten as the wording is confusing. I understand the rules now, however, I had to ask a moderator to clarify one of them for the reason provided above. The problem I'm having to understand is why is the wiki advertised on the website if it isn't 100% accurate? Just take the wiki off so it doesn't confuse anybody.
     

    ComboCreator

    Active Member
    Messages
    28
    Jude is an olderish player he hopefully would have read the rules once or twice. Ruinous is a newer member than Jude. Even though she may be Mod she may have only read the rules the same number as Jude. Either had the decision if they had read the rules. Ruinous just made a mistake.
    Your argument is completely invalid. "Jude is an oldish player" oh yea that means he's read the rules a bunch of times. She's a moderator and doesn't know the rules? I thought they were very clear on the rules page?

    Ridiculous
     

    MarshMelody

    Well-Known Member
    Messages
    89
    I agree with @MarshMelody, some of the rules need to be rewritten as the wording is confusing. I understand the rules now, however, I had to ask a moderator to clarify one of them for the reason provided above. The problem I'm having to understand is why is the wiki advertised on the website if it isn't 100% accurate? Just take the wiki off so it doesn't confuse anybody.
    ^^^ I agree with @majestuosoSlime , what’s the point of the wiki when it can be modified by anyone. It will mainly just confuse the players.
     

    Artela

    Member
    Messages
    20
    Can't we all just forget about this?
    The past is the past forgive and forget!!
    Share The Love <3<3<3<3<3
    Not while there are still players banned due to the confusion caused by having been cleared to do something by one Mod and then banned by another.
     

    Skizzles

    Well-Known Member
    Messages
    776
    I do not see where to edit the Wiki otherwise I would do a few revisions myself to match the current rules, reword a few things, and try to clear it up. In my personal opinion I think mistakes happen from anyone New Moderators to even Administrators. No one in the world is perfect and by far if someone decides to pick on someone for 1 mistake think how it would make you feel if a group of people attacked you for a mistake you did. Words are words, they can be mixed around when being moved from person to person, someone could mistype or misspeak and at the end of the day Really there is no point in arguing over all this drama. Lets focus on important things like bugs that people encounter and helping each other.
     

    ComboCreator

    Active Member
    Messages
    28
    I do not see where to edit the Wiki otherwise I would do a few revisions myself to match the current rules, reword a few things, and try to clear it up. In my personal opinion I think mistakes happen from anyone New Moderators to even Administrators. No one in the world is perfect and by far if someone decides to pick on someone for 1 mistake think how it would make you feel if a group of people attacked you for a mistake you did. Words are words, they can be mixed around when being moved from person to person, someone could mistype or misspeak and at the end of the day Really there is no point in arguing over all this drama. Lets focus on important things like bugs that people encounter and helping each other.
    Once again skizzles im going to kindly ask you to **** off. Your input is unneeded and wrong. "I think mistakes happen from anyone New Moderators to even Administrators" lol yea mistakes happen to the best of us, its just funny that the staff think its alright to ban a player BECAUSE of the mistake the STAFF made.
     

    Skizzles

    Well-Known Member
    Messages
    776
    Once again skizzles im going to kindly ask you to **** off. Your input is unneeded and wrong. "I think mistakes happen from anyone New Moderators to even Administrators" lol yea mistakes happen to the best of us, its just funny that the staff think its alright to ban a player BECAUSE of the mistake the STAFF made.
    When you and your gang acknowledge that it was a mistake, even argue with @BrandonHNL about it and then simply decide to ignore what he said and do it anyway that is no ones mistake but those who got banned. If you guys can not see that then there is no point in this thread, she should not have said its allowed yes, when Jetpuff came on and clarified that it is not allowed and you all acknowledged what he said and then argued with him about her that means you guys clearly understood the rules in place and Judes ban is justified in that he chose not to listen and to go against the rules anyway.
     

    ComboCreator

    Active Member
    Messages
    28
    When you and your gang acknowledge that it was a mistake, even argue with @BrandonHNL about it and then simply decide to ignore what he said and do it anyway that is no ones mistake but those who got banned. If you guys can not see that then there is no point in this thread, she should not have said its allowed yes, when Jetpuff came on and clarified that it is not allowed and you all acknowledged what he said and then argued with him about her that means you guys clearly understood the rules in place and Judes ban is justified in that he chose not to listen and to go against the rules anyway.
    Yea because Jude had a scam that was totally unknown. His /pwarp said that it was a Wilderness Scam. He's the first player in awhile to get banned for this and it is not a coincidence.

    I never remember saying this?
    Pretty sure at one point you did, or you said you can't punish for it. If not my bad
     
    Status
    Not open for further replies.